Self-Employed vs. Employed on a Foreign Assignment Outside the U.S.
December 30, 2018
by: Marc J. Strohl, CPA, Protax Consulting Services Inc.
Click here for PDF version.
The goal of this article is to provide a comprehensive checklist of information for the U.S. person to consider prior to accepting an assignment outside the U.S. This article is not designed to teach you the technical competence required to perform self compliance; however it will certainly arm you with the knowledge to determine if your U.S. tax preparer knows all that they should know to provide you with technically competent professional services.
To Be Employed Versus Self-Employed (SE):
Generally, employees on foreign assignments have distinct advantages over those self-employed (SE).
Eliminated under TCJA 2017- Although foreign unreimbursed employee expenses will be excluded from Schedule A, therefore not affecting the amount of the FEIE claim; conversely.
All overseas SE person’s Schedule C foreign expenses and applicable foreign self-employed adjustments on IRS Form 1040 pre TCJA 2017 line(s) 23-32 (e.g. ½ the SE tax, the SEHI deduction, etc…) dollar for dollar reduce the amount of the $105,900 for 2019 ($103,900 for 2018, $102,100 for 2017, $101,300 for 2016, $100,800 for 2015, $99,200 for 2014, $97,600 for 2013, $95,100 for 2012, $92,900 for 2011 and $91,500 for 2010) FEIE available.
Additionally, as a SE person’s net SE income is subject to U.S. FICA (Federal Insurance Contributions Act) taxes- social security 6.2 percent on the first $132,900 for 2019 ($128,400 for 2018) of wages and Medicare (1.45 percent on all wages or net SE income) taxes, SE persons additionally end up paying both the employee and employer portions. This effectively combines to 15.3 percent (6.2 percent + 1.45 percent = 7.65 percent x 2) FICA taxes for all SE persons reporting net income on Schedule C, which is always assessable if net income on Schedule C arises since SE FICA taxes are notaffected by the FEIE and HD.
However, persons employed abroad and not on U.S. payroll, but instead locally hired on a foreign payroll are not subject to U.S. employee FICA taxes at all. They would become subject to the social security tax regime of the respective country in which they work, if any.
To mitigate the above, the IRS always views the substance over legal form of an employee-employer or master-servant relationship under common law definition to hold. Further, IRS Revenue Ruling 87-41 dictates that subject to their twenty point analysis it may be possible to declare earnings on IRS Form 1040 as line 7 wages (versus as an independent contractor or self-employed individual on IRS Form 1040- Schedule C) and subject this wage income to only the employee ½ of the SE tax using Form 8919, Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax on Wages, where an individual works for a U.S. corporation issuing them wage income on Form 1099-MISC, as box 7- Nonemployee Compensation. If they work for a foreign corporation then there are no U.S. SE or FICA tax implications.
Where clearly the individual fails the common law employee-employer definition or it may be difficult to apply IRS Revenue Ruling 87-41 to avoid U.S. FICA SE taxes then the self-employed taxpayer may consider: 1) Totalization/ Social Security Agreements reached between the U.S. and twenty-seven (27) countries that may alleviate U.S. SE FICA taxes, failing which, 2) going on a foreign or a third party payroll, 3) having their client put them on payroll, 4) having a non-related person own a foreign entity that in turn pays them a wage, or 5) a U.S. SE person doing business abroad may also do business directly through a foreign entity to avoid U.S. FICA SE taxes, where they have not checked the box on Form 8832 (Entity Classification Election) to be treated as a one-member disregarded entity that automatically defaults to a Schedule C (Profit or Loss from a Business). Assuming the foreign entity is an active business (no Sub Part F income- generally passive income), then we recognize shareholder or owner corporate deferral reporting of both salary and dividends on a cash paid basis.
However, there are a myriad of onerous U.S. reporting requirements whenever a U.S. person owns directly or indirectly 10% or more of any foreign entity. Form(s) 5471- Information Return of U.S. Persons with Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations, 8865- Return of U.S. Persons with Respect to Certain Foreign Partnerships and 8858- Information Return of U.S. Persons with Respect to Certain Foreign Disregarded Entities – may come into play along and in the case of a foreign corporation only Form 926- Return of a U.S. Transferor of Property to a Foreign Corporation. The complexity of these respective forms, their instructions, including the need to apply U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (G.A.A.P.) makes the associated compliance further burdensome. Further in the majority of cases the U.S. CPA will not have the detailed information required for such compliance. As such usually it is the foreign accountant or client themselves whom must complete these forms.
Further the TCJA of 2017 imposed not only a one time “deemed repatriation tax” or ‘transition tax’ of 15.5% on untaxed foreign earnings or business profits accumulated overseas from 1986- December 31, 2017 held in cash or cash-equivalents and 8% for profits held in non-cash form, but also starting for the 2018 income tax year under IRC Sec 951(A) imposed an annual GILTI (Global Intangible Low Tax Income) inclusion. The IRS only released those GILTI tax ‘proposed’ regulations on September 23, 2018. The GILTI would be taxed at ordinary U.S. income tax rates.
As in the case of the one-time ‘Repatriation” IRC Sec 965 tax, this would apply whether or not the funds had been repatriated by deeming these earnings to be repatriated, for any U.S. persons (U.S. individuals, domestic corporations, partnerships, trusts and estates) owning more than 10% of a controlled foreign corporation (CFC), where a CFC is a foreign corporation in which US persons control more than 50%.
New reporting rules requiring the filing of Form 8992, U.S. Shareholder Calculation of Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, are also described in the proposed regulations.
Other Interesting Facts:
- These exclusions- FEIE, HE and HD are elective, and should not be used when they trigger income inclusion. This would occur, for example where Schedule C expenses outstrip income and these expenses are added back to actually create income.
Marc J. Strohl, CPA is a Principal at Protax Consulting Services Inc.
He may be reached at: Tel: (212) 714-1805, Fax: (212) 714-6654
Web site: www.protaxconsulting.com
Member and Featured Faculty of
- American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
- New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants
- NYSSCPA’s 100% Membership Program
- Association of International Tax Consultants, U.S. Member
- CCH Wolters Kluwer Faculty
- Lawline Faculty
- Furthered Faculty
- Strafford Faculty
- Clear Law Institute Faculty